Tag Archives: Man-hatred

A Pseudo-Religion

Feminism is a Dangerous Pseudo-Religion

Some reflections, for International Women’s Day, on the irrational and destructive nature of feminist belief

Janice Fiamengo, Mar 08, 2025

God Has Been a Woman Since the Beginning of Time

I often joke with people that feminism has been like a born-again religion for me – that once I found it and let it into my life, my entire perspective shifted in such a way that suddenly, everything made sense – and that I feel compelled to spread that gospel.”

The author of this passage from Everyday Feminism claims to be joking about her “born-again” faith. However, feminism is accurately understood not as a social science but as a perverse secular religion, steeped in mythology and faith-based claims, and exerting a malign influence on adherents’ minds.

We see its results every day: the rage, the apocalyptic anxiety, the rankling discontent and festering bitterness. A recent American Family survey showed “liberal” (i.e. feminist) women to be markedly lonelier and less satisfied with their lives than “conservative” (less feminist) women, at least in part due, as the study’s authors theorized, to liberal women’s alienation from positive sources of meaning. No one should be surprised by such findings, for the so-called gospel of feminism is anything but good news.

**

In what ways is feminism like a religion?

The following serves as a working definition:

A religion is a belief system that explains the origin and purpose of life on earth, posits a spiritual or supernatural dimension to human existence, involves faith in what cannot be definitively known, and results in the radically changed understanding and behavior of the adherent.

All of these are true for feminism, but they lead not to gratitude and peace but to grievance and pique.

15 Ways to Unlock Your Sacred Feminine: Intuition & Power

Feminism offers an origin story: the patriarchy, an unjust social system in which elite white men oppress all other groups. Some, though not all, feminist theories also posit an ancient matriarchy, a nurturing, egalitarian, and non-exploitative society that predated patriarchy, in which human beings lived in harmony with one another and with nature. This is a feminist version of the Garden of Eden, protected not by a deity but by a reigning “ethics of care.” Here women held power and exercised it for the good of all. Some Indigenous cultures are of particular interest to feminists because they offer evidence of such matriarchal structures.

At some point in all feminist origin stories, humankind fell from grace because of male sin. Men invented and imposed a male-led structure of social relations that severed women from their power. Men also introduced other forms of hierarchical control based on race, sexual identity, and physical ability. Specific feminist theories have been developed to address these related forms of oppression. But all feminisms, regardless of their particular emphases and approaches, reject the notion that the male-led social order had any purpose other than exploitation.

Read the rest here . . .

False claims – come and get it!

Wicked Riches

– Victims’ compensation rewards liars and cheats.

Bettina Arndt, Feb 27, 2025

What a story! Our media was agog at the recent NSW police announcement that they had exposed a $1.3 billion scheme for making fraudulent child sexual abuse claims. All the major media outlets excitedly reported on this huge “claim farming” scheme which recruited former young offenders, prison inmates and school students to file fake sex abuse compensation claims. At one prison, a third of the inmates had submitted claims.

The investigation revealed 4,000 faked claims, with the many law firms involved paying the claim farmers a benefit of about $2000 for each claim. One group of claims farmers apprehended in the police raid was found to have 100 applications ready to go – so they missed out on $30 million through the police intervention.

Big numbers, shocking scandal. And a mighty blow to the feminist narrative claiming false rape claims hardly ever happen. Here’s solid evidence that they are absolutely rampant, particularly when it comes to raking in money from our shockingly slack victims’ compensation schemes.

Across the country we have victims’ compensation schemes which require absolutely no proof to achieve a payout. All that is needed is a quick trip to a police station to make a statement. As I have reported many times, most police are no longer investigating sexual abuse claims. The complainant’s statement is taken as gospel. And then our government bodies pay out.

Even if the matter ends up in a court, the woman is often given the payout years before any decision is made about the validity of the claim. And get this, she has no obligation to return the money if the court decides the evidence supporting it doesn’t stack up.

But if the accused man is found guilty, he has to repay the government for the victim’s payout.

What about the victims of false claims?

The most extraordinary thing about the whole claim farming scandal is that not one journalist thought to ask questions about the men being falsely accused.

The only mention in the media coverage was a press release from the Independent Education Union (IEU) stating that “claim farming” was a substantial problem in nongovernment schools. In 2017 Australia held a Royal Commission into historical sexual abuse in institutions, where shocking abuse was found to have occurred in some school settings.

Read the rest here . . .

DEI is killing people

How female bureaucrats refuse to target male suicide

Bettina Arndt Feb 14, 2025

Wow. After all those years of seeing discrimination against men becoming ever more blatant and intense, who would have thought that one crazy dude in the White House could threaten this highly successful feminist enterprise.

We will have to see how it all pans out, but Trump’s decision to eliminate all government diversity programs is causing ructions in the mighty international DEI industry which has spent decades creating programs and policies designed to ensure women are advantaged over men, particularly white men, at every turn.

Note that Trump’s Executive Order 14171 is titled “Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity.” Even though most of the howls of outrage from woke folk is focussed on the impact of racial affirmative action policies, merit-based opportunity would be a real novelty for white men working in colleges and government organisations across America who are used to being at the bottom of the heap.

A report from the American ABC shows no interest in the notion of “merit-based opportunity” but chooses instead to wail about the impact on a young female researcher working on intestinal parasites in India – supported by diversity-based funding which is now under threat. The news story reports on legal challenges to Trump’s Executive Order and quotes a defiant professor determined to fight back, “We’re doing DEI whether they like it or not.”

Well, professor, most people don’t like it. The endless discrimination against men is far from popular – look at that strong vote from young men which helped sweep Trump into power. Australia’s Opposition Leader Peter Dutton named the problem in a recent podcast, saying young men were feeling “disenfranchised and ostracised”, and fed up with being passed over for jobs.

As Dutton put it, “They’re pushing back and saying, ‘well, why am I being overlooked at work for a job, you know, three jobs running when I’ve got, you know, a partner at home, and she’s decided to stay at home with three young kids, and I want a promotion at work so that I can help pay the bills at home.’”

DEI is responsible for men finding themselves pushed out. And now, finally they are allowed to complain about it. With the new zeitgeist encouraging people to give voice to their discontent about diversity programs, the public mood has even forced corporate America to take notice.

Look what’s happening in the corporate world where so many big companies are now choosing to scale back their DEI programs. Last year a host of companies moved in this direction: American Airlines, Boeing, Ford, Harley-Davidson, Lowe’s, Nissan, Walmart. Amazon, META and McDonalds took similar measures just last month. Even the public broadcaster, PBS, has got rid of their DEI department. Now that’s a real turn-about for this huge anti-male propaganda unit.

Read the rest here . . .

How the feminist cancer is destroying a once great nation

The latest article from Janice Fiamengo’s Substack shows how deeply Great Britain is riddled with the man-hating cancer of feminism. In Australia, the feminist cancer has not penetrated as deeply as in Great Britain, but it is on its way.

*****

Feminism and the Grooming Gangs

Why elite feminists prefer to target white men as the UK’s primary sexual predators

Janice Fiamengo, Feb 08, 2025

Grooming Gang Scandal: Why is the UK government responsible for this  nationwide horror? | Media Scan

Just don’t ask where all this outrage for rape victims was when a jury in a civil trial concluded Farage’s good friend Donald Trump had sexually abused the writer E. Jean Carroll, or when Trump proposed Matt Gaetz—who was facing allegations (which he denied) of sex with a minor—for attorney general.

Gaby Hinsliff, “This is how the grooming scandal is being weaponized

*****

For decades, most prominent feminists in the United Kingdom kept quiet about the Pakistani Muslim grooming gangs, preoccupied with the gender pay gap, the nefarious influence of Andrew Tate, or the need to criminalize “persistent staring.”

When they do address the issue, their response is to make bizarre equivalencies, as above, and to insist that all men are equally to blame for child rape and exploitation.

In a recent article for The Spectator, for example, British feminist advocate Julie Bindel, one of the few feminists who did write about the scandal in earlier years, was toeing the party line. In the final paragraph of her article (“Grooming gang victims are still being ignored”), she expressed the conviction that

“We need to see a wider acknowledgement of the scale of ‘grooming gangs’ beyond racial or cultural lines, because child sexual abuse has been going on for centuries and there will be plenty more victims until the police really address the issues.”

In Bindel’s formulation, a particular sex crime is universalized as “child sexual abuse” to smear all men in all times.

Bindel even suggested that white girls had been receiving rather too much attention while “black and minority” victims have had their experiences “obliterated by a narrative that portrays ‘grooming gangs’ as exclusively Pakistani Muslim men abusing white girls.” That dishonest sentence, in which the word exclusively is made to carry a heavy load of implication, is the only time in the entire article that Bindel uses the words Pakistani or Muslim. (No one credible has ever suggested that only Pakistani Muslims were involved or that only white girls were victimized.)

As a feminist of the Left, Bindel had always treated the grooming gangs story with caution. In “Mothers of Prevention,” an article she published in The Sunday Times back in 2007, she gave the names of convicted abusers and identified them as Pakistani Muslim, but she pressed home the point that “One of the many tragedies resulting from this phenomenon is how it is fueling racism and mistrust of whites towards Pakistanis where little existed previously.” Perhaps the girls raped at 12 and pimped out at 13 would have been better off if there had been a bit more mistrust and “racism” in their communities. And given how many people in positions of power worked together to protect the perpetrators, the racism seems to have been solely directed against white Britons, especially against the parents who pleaded in vain for the criminals to be stopped.

Read the rest here . . .

Bettina Arndt needs our support

The Arndt Army

– Changing the lives of men

Bettina Arndt Jan 15, 2025

Welcome to The Arndt Army.

It’s been an exciting few weeks, planning a whole new phase in my crusade for men. Amongst my supporters is an AI nerd, Steve Rossiter, who very kindly offered to use this extraordinary new technology to promote key articles and blogs from the forty years I have spent advocating for men. Eventually we plan to have my major books available on audio presented in my voice, perhaps even translated into a variety of languages, plus many of my major articles and blogs.

And Steve’s even promised to produce an avatar – a virtual me! That will be coming soon.

This is the start of The Arndt Army – soon to be launched on X as @TheArndtArmy – aimed at bringing all those years of research and advocacy to a huge new audience. Those of you who are not keen on the X platform will be able to access new developments in the Notes section of my Substack page.

The Arndt Army will also be a call to action, led by some of the outstanding volunteers who have reached out to me over the years, keen to contribute to change. I’m pulling together a leadership team who will take the initiative on key fronts needing attention, such as providing support for men in our legal system, and convincing politicians that Australia is at crisis point.

Over 500 people have volunteered to help me over the past decade, but I need to know who is currently on board to take urgent action. Here’s a survey for you to fill in to be part of The Arndt Army if you are able to step up now.

I know that men and their loved ones across the country have had enough of males being targeted in this shockingly biased system. Now’s the time to do your bit. We need team leaders to pull everything together but also plenty of people on the ground, willing to write letters, join groups visiting politicians, or simply support men on the phone or sit with them during their court cases. Our Mothers of Sons group will be welcome to join The Arndt Army, contributing to our community wide effort.

In case you need a reminder of why we must get moving, here are a few stories which have crossed my desk in recent months – just some of the sad stories of injustice towards men that have now reached an absolute torrent.

Men under siege.

Read the rest here . . .

Australia’s feminised legal system

Last year I was called up for jury duty. I made it to the jury selection in the courtroom which is the second stage in selecting the members of the jury.

In front of me – and the other prospective jury members – were a female judge, a female and a male associate to support the judge, a female barrister and a female solicitor for the defence, and a male barrister and a female solicitor for the prosecution. A female clerk was in charge of herding those for jury selection.

The female solicitor for the prosecution wore an expression of permanent fury – and the gay colours. I was not selected in the ballot.

Most graduates from university legal departments are now female.

The predominance of females in the law system is a total turnaround of the male-to-female ratio in the legal system. It’s safe to say that the overwhelming majority of those females are feminist activists, as in all sectors where females make it to executive positions. The female CEOs in the supermarket and airline sectors are not shy about announcing their intentions to pursue relentlessly quotas, that is, giving preference to females.

Jarryd Hayne was a fool not to suspect the trap he was walking into. But being a fool does not automatically mean one is guilty of each and every crime levelled against one – except if you’re a male.

Hayne’s experience in the Australian legal system has been a pitiless farce. What especially marks the feminist activist is her pitiless vindictiveness.

More females at university – but studying what?

Feminists boast there are more females than males now enrolled at university as evidence women are superior to men. But what percentage of females graduate with feminist degrees? Unproductive man-hating degrees that would qualify them best for HR positions – where they have free rein to persecute and eliminate men.

Alexander Grace’s video below is about US circumstances. However, much of it would apply to Australia.

One should read the informative comments from males after the video.

Mean girls and feminists

Tom Golden’s substack MEN ARE GOOD is highly recommended.

*****

Mean Girls and Feminists: Is There a Difference?

Tom Golden, Dec 05, 2024


In a previous post, we explored why men often choose not to fight back against women. Many reasons tie back to their biologically and socially driven desire for social status. Men tend to carefully assess conflicts, aiming to maximize gains while minimizing losses. Maintaining high status, especially within hierarchical structures, requires significant effort. These dynamics—marked by unexpected rises and falls—have shaped men’s behavior for generations.

However, beginning in the 1970s, feminists began weaponizing gynocentrism, using it as a protective shield while directing hateful accusations at men. If men were to treat women similarly, they would face immediate chastisement and punishment. Instead, feminists exploited their societal gynocentric privilege destructively, prioritizing their own agendas.

Initially, this hostility manifested in labels like “chauvinists” or “pigs.” Over time, unchecked accusations escalated, with men increasingly blamed for nearly every difficulty feminists perceived. Consider the many labels feminists have used to describe men over the years:

  • Chauvinists
  • Oppressors
  • Patriarchs
  • Privileged
  • Deadbeat dads
  • Pigs
  • Misogynists
  • Rapists
  • Abusers
  • Incels
  • Toxic

Now, imagine if men’s groups conjured similar names for women. How long would such groups last? Would they garner media support? Not a chance. Gynocentrism allows feminists to spew hatred without consequence, often gaining widespread backing.

Read the rest here . . .

Trump’s appeal to the legitimate feelings of young men

In another brilliant analysis, Janice Fiamengo demonstrates where Trump won the presidency.

******

Not the End, Not Even the Beginning of the End

But a modest defeat for feminism in Donald Trump’s victory

Janice Fiamengo, Nov 15, 2024

Men in Red: Why More and More Young Male Voters Are Being MAGA-fied |  Vanity Fair

In the week following the American election results, a consensus of sorts has emerged: this was about men.

Whether in distasteful embrace of “bro” masculinity, or in celebration of a world in which “male traits can build rather than destroy” (in the surprisingly sympathetic words of Quillette’s Claire Lehmann),  men were the ones who determined the election outcome, so the story goes. Donald Trump was victorious over Kamala Harris because he gave men permission to reject feminist dictates, including about abortion.

A good deal of the commentary on this theme, not surprisingly, has been negative, ranging from the sneering to the hysterical. There have also been raucous celebrations and upbeat analyses of the “rebellion of American men.” Even amidst the male-blaming and catastrophizing, the talk of sex strikes and husband-poisoning, there have been signs that the era of men being taken for granted as voters may at last be coming to an end.

Democrat Richard Reeves of the Brookings Institution under-stated the case when he pointed out that “Trying to either shame or guilt or scare men into voting Democrat was spectacularly unsuccessful.” Future Democratic campaigns, he suggests, will have to take men into account. Whether the Trump presidency will deliver on the hopes now raised among some men’s advocates remains to be seen.

*****

First, a review: the Democratic campaign vision for men was notable for its anti-male contempt.   

Democrats promoted a progressive masculinity, one that was explicitly subservient to women. Francis Wilkinson at Bloomberg praised VP candidate Tim Walz as a man who “can happily play second fiddle to a Black woman” and “doesn’t have to live in constant fear of losing status.” In case the implied insult to imagined Republican men (with their fragile masculinity) was not clear enough, Wilkinson concluded his piece with a direct address: “He’s not frightened of women, afraid of Black people or terrified of the future. Why are you?”

Joyful warrior Tim Walz and the last days of patriarchy | Salon.com

Riffing on the same theme, Sam Berry at The Los Angeles Loyalan, a campus newspaper, celebrated Walz for his “gentle masculinity” and willingness to “take a backseat to his running mate.” A soft man happy to play a supporting role to a DEI presidential candidate was purportedly attractive to young people (by which he seemed to mean young women). Berry interviewed a sociology professor at UC Santa Barbara who saw it as a positive that “Walz overall doesn’t express his masculinity” (whatever that means) and who asserted that “People [by which she seemed to mean women] are more happy to see a man support a woman in power rather than using his role as a man in society to benefit his own self.”

Read the rest here . . .