All posts by gcw

Hysterical cub reporter on ‘horrific scenes’ at Sydney University

From the hysterical heading of the article below by cub reporter Natalie Brown, one would think that Muslim terrorists had invaded Sydney University and shot and stabbed the whole place up.

But, no, Natalie, who looks like one of the affronted students she writes about, is reporting on the 97th meeting of Sydney University’s Student Representative Council (SRC), notorious for its control year-in-year-out by SU’s far-far-far-left.

At issue for whimpering Natalie is ‘a landmark report that [allegedly] exposed the systemic culture of sexual violence, hazing, elitism and inaction at Australia’s university colleges’ which report two (you guessed it) male students disparaged and questioned, and a third ripped up before the appalled faces of its far-far-left (and likely lesbian) manufacturers. Of course, the male student’s action was misogynistic in essence and typical of the male species. This is the usual display of the man-hatred endemic in the West.

First, the unknowledgeable reader of student politics should be aware that SRC meetings are always a crowded rowdy affair with the left and far-left dominating the shouting and (sometimes) violence. It was rather brave of the three male students to take on the far-left crowd at the SRC annual meeting. Well done, boys. There should be more of it.

Second, the readers of this website will know that a variety of highly credentialled women have vigorously attacked such reports as the one ripped up and scorned by the three male students. Such reports are the political product of incorrigibly prejudiced feminists whose occupation is tearing down the ‘patriarchy’. I refer the reader to the articles by Bettina Arndt and Janice Fiamengo.

Third (a secondary point), it is a show of vomitous hypocrisy and sanctimony for news.com.au to support their cub reporter’s whimpering about male misogynistic students at Sydney University when its website is full of degrading photos of bare tits and bums, and the lascivious behaviour of the famous and infamous.

* * * * *

‘Rip it up’: Horrific scenes at University of Sydney student council meeting

A “reprehensible display”, caught on camera, at a University of Sydney student meeting on Wednesday night has been condemned.

Natalie Brown, news.com.au, 31 Oct 2024

University of Sydney students have been left appalled by a “reprehensible display of misogyny” at a student council meeting on Wednesday night.

During the meeting, two male students tore up copies of a landmark report that exposed the systemic culture of sexual violence, hazing, elitism and inaction at Australia’s university colleges.

The annual meeting – held after the student elections for Representatives-Elect of the 97th Student Representative Council – was recorded and live-streamed in its entirety by USYD’s student newspaper, Honi Soit – a fact that attendees are fully aware of.

The incident occurred during a presentation by incoming SRC Women’s Officers and current Sexual Violence Officers, Ellie Robertson and Martha Barlow, that addressed the recent bullying incident at St Paul’s College and the “years and years of abhorrent and disgusting behaviour” at USYD, particularly at its “unreformable” residential colleges.

“Even after The Red Zone Report – which we are handing out to all you college apologists – and the Broderick Report, we have seen more instances of hazing, bullying and sexual violence. This is a continuing result of the elitist culture of these institutions,” Ms Robertson told attendees, while Ms Barlow passed out copies of The Red Zone Report to the elected Student Representatives.

“This is a continuing result of the elitist culture of these institutions.”

In response to Ms Robertson and Ms Barlow’s presentation, two male students ripped up the report – one remarking “no one cares”, while a third male student picked up the shreds of it and threw them in the air. All three boys are affiliated with the campus’ Young Liberals-aligned political group.

News.com.au has contacted the group for comment.

‘It is a quite frankly reprehensible display of misogyny.' Picture: Supplied

‘It is a quite frankly reprehensible display of misogyny.’ Picture: Supplied

A photo of the shredded Red Zone Report. Picture: Supplied/Honi Soit

A photo of the shredded Red Zone Report. Picture: Supplied/Honi Soit

‘A reprehensible display of misogyny’

The students’ actions have been condemned by the university, meeting’s attendees (most of whom were “appalled by the behaviour”), and the authors of and participants in The Red Zone Report, who spoke to news.com.au about the boys’ “insulting and shameful” display.

Ms Barlow, who was the one to pass out the copies of the report, said it was “horrific, but perhaps not unsurprising” that the response of the Liberals and colleges’ representatives was too [sic] “laugh in my face, tear it up, and throw the pieces at us”.

“It is a quite frankly reprehensible display of misogyny to so blatantly laugh . . . (at the) victim-survivors (in the report), and an incredibly telling one,” Ms Barlow told news.com.au.

“Just like the colleges themselves, these student representatives would prefer to ignore the problem of sexual violence altogether and pretend it doesn’t exist. To this we say that the time is long past to sweep this under the rug.”

Read the rest here . . .

Five billion dollars to persecute men

The Albanese government has gifted five billion dollars to the worst feminist man-haters in Australia to persecute men, driving many to suicide. In Bettina Arndt’s latest post, read an anonymous policeman’s heart-breaking account of the weaponised use of a Domestic Violence Protection Order by an unconscionable woman and her feminist abettors.

*****

Whistleblower police

– Reluctant enforcers for feminist DV regime

Bettina Arndt, Oct 27, 2024

The feminists have it all sewn up. All it took was very effective bullying of politicians to have draconian legislation pushed through various state parliaments resulting in unproven domestic violence accusations flooding our criminal law system.

My focus today is on the reluctant enforcers required to do the dirty work for this evil regime – namely our co-opted police officers. I receive regular emails from these long-suffering people, many of whom are appalled at finding themselves having to enforce such unjust laws.

Here’s a letter I received recently from a Queensland police officer:

“I saw something today that sickened me. A man came to the station after receiving a phone call asking him to attend a police station. He genuinely had no idea what it was all about. 

His wife had made a private application for a domestic violence protection order (DVO) which had been heard in court and a DVO put in place.  He knew nothing about this.

I had to explain the document to him and serve him with a copy. 

He was visibly shaken! His eyes filled with tears.  He quietly said, “I’m sorry, I am having trouble processing this.”  I advised him that he urgently needed to seek professional legal advice. I wanted to speak with him privately to give him some idea what he could do but he said he had to go. He was struggling not to break down and cry.  

The order had many conditions. He is not allowed back to his home, even though his office and work equipment is there, he cannot contact his wife nor his two children except through a solicitor.

I read the wife’s application. The short version is that she wants to end the marriage and the man is having trouble accepting this. They had an argument over the fact she is tearing his whole world apart where he is alleged to have behaved badly, pointing his finger in her face and yelling, “I fucking hate you”.  He then kicked over a watering can and the water went onto his wife’s legs.  

Police attended and suggested that he should go and stay somewhere else, at least for a few days. He left the home, and a few days later told his wife he planned to return to their home.  She told him that he couldn’t come back – she was “terrified” of him. She then lodged the DVO application.  

This DVO is based solely on what she says happened, no other evidence. I GUARANTEE that this is going to get a lot of mileage in upcoming Family Law Court matters.

Judging by the demeanour of the guy, I think it is unlikely that he is a hot head or violent.  This matter STINKS of a setup by the wife’s solicitor.  It is a malicious strategic move that was carefully planned and executed. 

Sure, I think it is very likely that he did what she said he did – pointed at and yelled at her and kicked over the watering can. I absolutely do not condone his behaviour, but MY GOD the consequences are so out of proportion!

He will probably never get to spend time with his children again because her solicitor is now armed with this DVO with him given no opportunity to provide his side of the story. The Family Law Court will not give a flying you-know-what about the circumstances, and how it came to be.  Here is the smoking gun that shows that he is violent and controlling and potentially abusive to the children.  

I know that he is absolutely SCREWED! I feel sick to the core.”  

It was very moving reading these heartfelt words from this ordinary copper. After talking to him I reached out to police in regular contact with me, asking them if they’d help record their experiences with these laws.

I’ve made a podcast with the officer who wrote the letter above – I’ve called him “Paul” – and another female constable we’ll call “Lisa” – we disguised their voices to protect them. Others were too nervous to participate but wrote comments about some of the topics we were discussing. It is ominous that even retired police voiced concerns about dire consequences if they were identified talking publicly about these matters.

Please help me this important interview gets the large audience it deserves. People need to know what’s happened to our justice system and here is a brutally honest report from the coalface.  

The stories they told me were shocking, even to a seasoned commentator like me.  

Take, for example, Paul’s experience at a recent police training course where they were presented with an example of a woman smashing up the windscreen of her partner’s car. Surely this was evidence of a violent, potentially dangerous woman? Oh no. The instructors informed the police officers that they were to assume it was the man who was behind the violence. “He must have done something to drive her to that point.”

At another training course unrelated to domestic violence, it was announced that there would be a further three days’ training at the end of the course, all about DV. A wag at the back of the room called out, “It’s the man!” and the whole room dissolved in hysterics. Everyone knows the point of all this training is to make sure police go into every investigation with only one focus: it must be the man. It’s become a joke because the ideological spin is so ridiculously heavy-handed.   

Another Queensland police officer – I’ll call him “Joe” – wrote to me explaining that previously it was standard practice for police responding to a domestic violence call to start by separating the couple, then obtain the different versions of events, speak to any witnesses and obtain physical evidence. If both had participated in the violence, then both received a DVO which was called a “cross order”.

The problem was this process meant women were sometimes charged. The feminist overlords found that totally unacceptable so they have now pushed through new legislation that determines it is “the person who is in most need of protection” who should be given the DVO.

The way this is interpreted, says Joe, is that even if a man is bleeding from the head after being hit by the woman, a DVO will still be taken against the man “as he might retaliate or become angry.” Hence, she’s deemed the one in need of protection. It is assumed men simply don’t need protection from women.

This is madness given there’s a solid body of international research which shows that in most violent homes there’s two-way violence, with women participating just as often as men. Yet these new laws require police to ignore that reality and only take DVOs out against men.

Laws in other states are moving in this direction but Queensland now takes the lead as the most anti-male jurisdiction in the country. We have reached the point in Queensland where the maximum penalty for intentionally cutting off a person’s arm is 25 years imprisonment, while the maximum penalty for removing a condom during (otherwise consensual) sex, is life imprisonment.

Read the rest here . . .

Women destroy civilizations

The claim that women ultimately destroy civilizations is not new. Indeed, you’ll find Aristotle suggesting the thesis two and a half thousand years ago.

Feminists, as one would expect, say that only males would make such a crazy claim which immediately disqualifies it as misogynistic and thus forbidden. I know of one case where a male youtuber was forced to remove a video making that very suggestion.

The trouble now for activist feminists – is there another sort? – is that intelligent, articulate young women are increasingly bucking against the established feminist narrative. Amy Gallagher who now appears on different platforms – look out for her – takes the claim seriously.

*****

Are crazy women DESTROYING the west?!

Boys feminized for failure

Christina Hoff Sommers, feminist philosopher and author of “The War Against Boys,” discusses the growing struggles of boys in a culture increasingly dictated by a toxic strain of Marxist feminism. Christina explains how, now that institutional barriers to female opportunity have all but disappeared, the feminist movement has become dominated by a faction that sees the world as a zero-sum game and therefore is fundamentally opposed to the flourishing of boys and men.

Schools, in particular, systematically neglect boys and pathologize their natural instincts, while elevating the psychological and behavioral tendencies of girls as inherently morally superior. Christina breaks down how this imbalance is shaping a generation of young men who are falling behind not only relative to their female peers but also in absolute historic terms.

The CEOs of Australia’s main airlines are feminist activists

Airline fake rape crisis

Let’s fight this anti-male propaganda.

Bettina Arndt, Oct 07, 2024

In 2020, within days of the government announcement that I was to be honoured for my work for men, Victoria’s Attorney-General Jill Hennessy called for me to be stripped of my award, arguing my “dangerous” views are an insult to abuse victims.

“Ms Arndt’s views and activities diminish the devastating experiences of victim-survivors of family and sexual violence, promote division and discourage victim-survivors from taking steps to ensure their survival and safety,” she told the ABC. Any number of government heavy-weights lined up to agree. 

They did their best to have me cancelled and succeeded in shutting me out of most mainstream media.

Now imagine what will happen if the government’s misinformation bill is passed. Labor’s Misinformation Bill – likely to be presented to parliament next session – puts the onus on social media platforms like YouTube and Facebook to avoid promoting “misinformation,” particularly that “result in harm or contribute to it.” That’s most of my work, according to my critics in the media and in the government.

Faced with the prospect of massive fines, social media companies are bound to err on the side of caution – by choosing to silence me totally. That could remove the few remaining opportunities I have to spread the word about what is happening to men.

The Misinformation Bill is an outrageous infringement of our civil liberties, putting our freedom of speech into the hands of a government-appointed entity. We all saw how that worked out during the Covid years. As I have pointed out many times, this concentration of power is bound to result in even more draconian laws and regulations adversely impacting on men – with feminists running so many of our institutions.  

We saw this with the eSafety Commissioner’s claims that women are “almost always” the major victims of online abuse; ignoring the risks to men and boys of sexual exploitation – read my blog here.   

So, this is an urgent call to all of you who support what I do. Please do your best to stop this bill getting through – by writing letters or, ideally, getting appointments to lobby the vital crossbenchers in the Senate who will determine the bill’s fate. The Libs have promised to vote against the bill (although they still say they will cook up their own version later).

Here’s a petition you can sign – but the personal approach is far more effective.

We can’t afford to let this one go through to the keeper. We have allowed so much to slip by which has created a poisonous culture for men and boys. We set young men up for rape charges by allowing school sexual consent courses to teach girls that drunk sex is sexual assault.  We allowed feminists to invent and criminalise coercive control as the latest weapon to lock up men. We let Labor get away with removing all protection of children’s rights to contact with their fathers in last year’s Family Law bill. The list goes on. 

Day after day our society becomes less tolerable for men and boys – and male suicide rates continue to climb. Right now, the government is seeking feedback on the latest National Suicide Prevention Strategy which, like all previous strategies, strenuously avoids properly addressing the fact that 6 of the 8 suicides each day are male, downplays the key issue of relationship breakup as one of the major triggers, and proposes strategies which will ensure most funding continues to go to women. It’s an utter disgrace. Please spend the time to examine it properly and send in your scathing critiques here. My blog will give you relevant background.  


The nonsense taking hold in our airlines might seem trivial in comparison – just one more insult in the never-ending male bashing. But it is worth taking a look at what is happening here . . .

Journalists are claiming a dramatic increase in sexual assaults on board aircrafts. Evil male hands creeping under blankets of sleeping women. Arms straying over armrests to nuzzle into a stranger’s breasts. Vulnerable women at the mercy of threatening predators.

Dig down into the alarmist reports and we discover that at the heart of the most recent news stories was an FBI report based on 96 cases of in-flight sexual assault allegations in 2023. That’s from over 800 million passengers on domestic flights! How’s that for a storm in a teacup?

Read the rest here . . .

Feminist brutalization of boys

After a broad survey of what feminist academics and teachers say about toxic, misogynistic schoolboys, Janice Fiamengo makes the comment:

If ever a case were to be made for all-male schools and all-male teaching staff, this document (by feminists) could be a primary exhibit.

I’ve been saying for years that boys need men to teach them. Not just any men, but manly men with a high sense of what it means to be a respectful, self-disciplined, self-sufficient man.

Once schools could tolerate females teaching boys, but that was when there were male teachers who could intervene when boys stepped out of line with female teachers. That is no longer the case. The education system has driven men out of the sector, leaving women – particularly young women – defenseless against restless boys.

The best teachers I had were men that were tough but fair.

It’s delusional to think that boys will respect teachers who constantly wagged their ideological fingers at them.

*****

Feminist teaching encourages boys as young as 11 years old to hate themselves (and women)

Reports from the UK and Australia reveal anti-male bias and boys’ resistance

Janice Fiamengo, Sep 29, 2024

eLearning at Christchurch Boys' High School

For years, feminists in the English-speaking school systems have done everything they can to psychologically destroy a generation of boys, calling their masculinity “problematic,” “hegemonic” and “toxic.”

At their least malign, feminist teachers have made it clear to boys that their perspectives and experiences aren’t as important as those of girls. Many businesses and organizations support programs aimed at girls’ academic success; there are no equivalent programs for boys. When study after study shows boys lagging behind girls in school, many feminists don’t even pretend to care, blaming the boys, as did Australian feminist Jane Caro, for their alleged privilege. Such ideologues continue to call for more feminist teaching, and moreover take direct aim at schoolboys’ maleness in what scholar Paul Nathanson has identified as a form of identity harassment, a pervasive psychological assault that creates doubt, shame, and alienation.

Editorial: No simple solutions for domestic violence & change can only  occur with greater respect for women | The West Australian

Under the feminist model, boys learn from a young age that their sex is responsible for violence and other serious harms, and that they must take personal responsibility for it. A few years ago, it came to light that the female principal of an Australian school thought it a good idea to hold an assembly in which the boys were to apologize for male misbehavior to the girl next to them. Naturally, no girls are ever expected to apologize to boys for the misdeeds of the female sex.

Calls regularly circulate, as in the West Australian’s “How We Stop This Kid Becoming a Monster,” for teaching to address the problem of predatory masculinity. Unless the feminist deprogrammers can get to work in the early years, we’re told, the boys will succumb to their inner monster. Boys learn that they can hurt girls and women even without meaning to, just by looking at them or holding traditional views. As we’ll see, any boy who objects to his own vilification will learn that objecting itself is a technique of domination.

Teaching Toxic Masculinity

recent report on UK schools provided a glimpse into what feminist instruction looks like, revealing that terms such as “hegemonic masculinity” and “toxic masculinity,” until a decade ago part of the radical feminist fringe, are now in the mainstream of pedagogy even in the lower grades.  

What Is Toxic Masculinity, and Why Is It So Harmful?

The Family Education Trust surveyed materials used by UK schools in their sex education classes. Out of 197 schools that responded to a request for information (more than 100 did not respond), 62 schools confirmed that they were teaching about toxic masculinity. 10 schools even admitted to teaching that “men and boys possess traits that are inherently toxic and negative for society.” (One would be relieved to hear that the principals of such schools and all participating teachers were immediately sanctioned, or at least told to stop such claptrap—but of course such has not occurred.)

Read the rest here . . .

False Allegations – an essential in feminism’s toolbox

Teen Vogue columnist Emily Lindin openly announced, “If some innocent men’s reputations have to take a hit in the process of undoing the patriarchy, that is a price I am absolutely willing to pay.” Lindin also boasted, “I’m actually not at all concerned about innocent men losing their jobs over false sexual assault/harassment allegations.”

*****

False Allegations: New Feminist Tactic to ‘Topple the Patriarchy’?

Coalition to End Domestic Violence

September 17, 2024 – International Falsely Accused Day was observed on September 9, with events held in 12 countries around the world (1). The highlight was an official statement by Victoria Villarruel, Vice President of Argentina.

Villarruel revealed how feminists are promoting the use of false allegations, thereby “breaking the principle of equality before the law, of innocence and defense; destroying the ties of thousands of families, and mainly many parents who can’t see their children.” (2)

Villarruel was certainly aware of the highly publicized allegations against Argentinian soccer coach Diego Guacci, accused of sexual harassment of five female soccer players. In response, Guacci denied all the accusations and provided a list of more than 100 potential witnesses to support his case. In the end, the FIFA Ethics Committee found the charges lacked merit, concluding that “the evidence on file is insufficient to corroborate, to its comfortable satisfaction, the players’ account of the events.” (3)

Indeed, false allegations have become a favored tactic of the feminist quest to “topple the patriarchy.” Teen Vogue columnist Emily Lindin openly announced, “If some innocent men’s reputations have to take a hit in the process of undoing the patriarchy, that is a price I am absolutely willing to pay.” Lindin also boasted, “I’m actually not at all concerned about innocent men losing their jobs over false sexual assault/harassment allegations.” (4)

The problem of false allegations emerged as a front-page issue in 2022 when actor Johhny Depp sued Amber Heard for defaming him with false accusations of domestic violence. The jury issued a unanimous verdict in Depp’s favor, with Heard paying him $1 million in damages (5).

Read the rest here . . .