Feminists boast there are more females than males now enrolled at university as evidence women are superior to men. But what percentage of females graduate with feminist degrees? Unproductive man-hating degrees that would qualify them best for HR positions – where they have free rein to persecute and eliminate men.
Alexander Grace’s video below is about US circumstances. However, much of it would apply to Australia.
One should read the informative comments from males after the video.
Tom Golden, Dec 14, 2024
Yes, Crystal Mangum has admitted to her false accusation against the Duke Lacrosse players. Nearly 20 years after the infamous incident, she now acknowledges that she lied and is asking for forgiveness from the three players she falsely accused. Mangum is currently serving a prison sentence after being convicted of murdering her boyfriend. You can’t make this up—the woman once universally believed to be telling the truth is now revealed as both a liar and a convicted murderer.
An article covering her recent confession details her admission of guilt and mentions the eventual disbarment of the prosecuting attorney. However, it conspicuously omits the consistent and overwhelming support Mangum received from the Duke administration, faculty, student body, police, media, and general public at the time. For men’s advocates, it was surreal and frustrating to watch as this evidently dishonest woman was enveloped in a flood of gynocentrism and public sympathy, while the Duke Lacrosse players were demonized.
I want to highlight what the article fails to mention. While it recounts Mangum’s confession, it neglects to discuss a number of things, including the repeated student and faculty protests staged in front of the Lacrosse players’ home. Photographs from the time capture these protests but can’t convey the deafening chants and relentless drumbeats. Among the many hateful messages shouted that day was: “Castrate!” The intensity and hostility of those protests remain etched in memory, a sobering reminder of how powerful gynocentrism is in manipulating public sentiment.
The crowds that gathered outside of their home were comprised of students and faculty. The assumption by these people was obviously that the young men were guilty. Simply due to the woman’s accusation.
Here’s an ad that was taken out that calls on people to come forward and tell the truth! IOW’s these players must be lying and withholding the truth. Here’s the ad with all of the player’s pictures.
I remember some years ago an elderly priest commenting on sin. As an aside, he said, as a priest hearing confessions year in, year out, in general men commit sins of lust and women sins of anger.
At the time, it was rather a surprise. Weren’t women kind, nurturing, sympathetic, patient, etc. etc.?
The priest’s words came back to me when the feminist-instigated conflict between men and women moved to centre stage. Not only could women fly into tempestuous fury but the way they expressed that fury was not in physical violence but in reputation destruction – total destruction. This was the theme of many of Jordan Peterson’s comments on the differences between men and women.
Since then others, particularly women, have commented on the uncontainable anger that often grips women. Janice Fiamengo made the comment below on the irrational fury that consumed many women following Donald Trump’s victory at the recent presidential election.
*****
Janice Fiamengo, Dec 15, 2024
Feminist uproar over Trump’s election was easy to predict, and not long in coming. Within ten days of the election, Clara Jeffery wrote in Mother Jones that “Women are furious—in a Greek mythology sort of way.” Taking examples from TikTok, Jeffery chronicled abundant “sorrow and disbelief and terror, but also incandescent rage,” which many women vowed to exorcise on men: “‘If his ballot was red, his balls stay blue,’” she quoted one.
In The New York Times, a 16-year-old girl, Naomi Beinart, charted her tumultuous emotions, which included a sense of betrayal because her male classmates had carried on with their lives on the day after the election, seemingly immune to the girls’ all-pervasive gloom and outrage. “Many of them didn’t seem to share our rage, our fear, our despair. We don’t even share the same future,” Beinart opined melodramatically.
No one with even a minimal acquaintance with social media can have missed the many similar, raging reactions: the heads being shaved, the death threats, the promised sex strikes, the fantasies of revenge against Trump-voting husbands. We are to understand that the re-election of a man rumored to lack sufficient pro-abortion commitment justifies thousands of self-recorded screams, imprecations, and poisoning plots.
At least one group of women gathered physically in Wisconsin to shout their angst and anger at Lake Michigan, and there have already been tentative (though apparently less enthusiastic than formerly) plans for a revival of the anti-Trump Women’s March protests, in which women with vulgar placards and pink hats exhibited their “collective rage.”
Women’s rage is all the rage.
In the article below Professor Kim Beswick, the University of NSW (female) professor of mathematics education, is reported as saying about an international survey that found a huge gap between male and female ability in maths and science:
“There is no reason for there to be a difference between boys’ and girls’ performance in maths. It relates to the social stereotype of maths being a male thing, and STEM careers are more male dominated. And that subtly influences how teachers and parents interact with students around maths.”
Crap, crap, and crap again. The professor deserves to have her employment terminated for such ignorance.
Few things have shown more regularity through the centuries than the natural differences between male and female in maths and science ability.
The survey will yet again provide excuses for feminists to hound the Labor government for more money to reconstruct the female mind – at the expense of boys.
Boys have become the great victim of feminist irrationality.
*****
Women’s Agenda, Jessie Tu, 5 December 2024
Australia boys are considerably outperforming girls in both maths and science, the latest study from a large-scale international analysis has found.
On Wednesday, The Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER) released the 2023 Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (Timss), which analysed the skills of Year 4 and Year 8 students across the world.
Roughly 14,000 Australian students were involved in the test, which remains the world’s longest running assessment of maths and science skills among school students.
It revealed that the gender gap in students’ maths performance is among the widest in the world, with the country’s male students in Year 4 achieving over twenty-points ahead of their female counterparts. Male students were found to be outperforming female students in both primary and high school.
“There is no reason for there to be a difference between boys’ and girls’ performance in maths,” Professor Kim Beswick told the Sydney Morning Herald. “It relates to the social stereotype of maths being a male thing, and STEM careers are more male dominated. And that subtly influences how teachers and parents interact with students around maths.”
The University of NSW professor of mathematics education added that girls are less confident than boys about their ability, even when the results do not reflect their beliefs.
Almost three quarter of Year 4 students in Australia met the proficiency benchmark in maths, compared with 64 per cent of students in Year 8. In science, over 70 per cent of students met the subject’s benchmarks in both year groups.
The Radical Center YouTube interviewed Amy Gallagher about her documentary How Psychology Went Mad for The New Culture Forum. See the previous post for the full documentary,
*****
Amy Gallagher is a Mental Health Nurse who has been working in the UK National Health Service (NHS) for 10 years. She has worked with adolescents and adults with a range of issues such as eating disorders, personality disorders, anxiety, depression, psychosis. She also has a post-graduate diploma in psycho-dynamic Psychotherapy. Amy is currently suing the NHS for suspending the final part of her training to become a psychotherapist because she disagreed with Critical Race Theory. She is a cultural commentator and appears on a weekly podcast, ‘Newspeak, for the New Culture Forum.
The New Culture Forum
After the closure of the Tavistock’s Gender Identity Service, many people have been left wondering how such institutional medical abuse of children could possibly have happened, and be allowed to happen for so long. How could some of the extremes of gender ideology and critical race theory be adopted by professionals who are supposed to be able to discern sanity from madness?
‘How Psychology Went Mad’ — the 12th episode in the New Culture Forum’s acclaimed #NCFHeresies documentary series — looks at the impact of ideology on psychotherapy, psychology, and psychiatry. It charts the development of the ‘talking cure’ and how this has become corrupted by far-left dogma and identity politics. In an era of increased censorship, political correctness, and infringements of freedom of speech, how can a profession based on being able to talk freely survive?
In this documentary, Amy Gallagher, describes her own experience of authoritarian ideology interfering with her own psychotherapy training and interviews those who have also spoken up about similar concerns.
Tom Golden’s substack MEN ARE GOOD is highly recommended.
*****
Tom Golden, Dec 05, 2024
In a previous post, we explored why men often choose not to fight back against women. Many reasons tie back to their biologically and socially driven desire for social status. Men tend to carefully assess conflicts, aiming to maximize gains while minimizing losses. Maintaining high status, especially within hierarchical structures, requires significant effort. These dynamics—marked by unexpected rises and falls—have shaped men’s behavior for generations.
However, beginning in the 1970s, feminists began weaponizing gynocentrism, using it as a protective shield while directing hateful accusations at men. If men were to treat women similarly, they would face immediate chastisement and punishment. Instead, feminists exploited their societal gynocentric privilege destructively, prioritizing their own agendas.
Initially, this hostility manifested in labels like “chauvinists” or “pigs.” Over time, unchecked accusations escalated, with men increasingly blamed for nearly every difficulty feminists perceived. Consider the many labels feminists have used to describe men over the years:
Now, imagine if men’s groups conjured similar names for women. How long would such groups last? Would they garner media support? Not a chance. Gynocentrism allows feminists to spew hatred without consequence, often gaining widespread backing.
This is the result of feminists forcing through quotas. Competence, training, practice, and experience mean nothing for feminists. Their concern is 50 percent or more of everything for women.
One female airline CEO wants 50 percent pilots. If female incompetence sabotages a navy ship because of a fundamental pilot mistake, at least the crew has a chance to get off the ship. With an airline, everyone dives headfirst from thousands of feet into the ground.
The irrationality of feminists knows no bounds. What will it take – what sort of a tragedy – will it take to bring authorities back to the standard of competence regardless of sex.
The video below provides all manner of evidence of what anyone with a mite of intelligence will observe if they take the trouble to look. Feminists and feminism are gradually collapsing academia. The rising population of women in higher education are turning once proud academic institutions into the academic equivalent of a women’s sowing circle where everyone is nice and equal.
To some extent, the fault is men’s. Contrary to feminist rhetoric, men don’t like fighting women, especially men in the once august academic environment. They have let it happen. If men don’t like what has happened, they have to fight back. But they have to do it the way feminists have gradually corrupted the universities. Manoeuvre and scheme.
The other way is to start again. Build up a male academic sector by shutting out those who haven’t the strength of mind for rigorous academic activities.