The homosexual movement mobilises and makes a joke of the judging on Dancing with the Stars

The new website is not entirely ready, but I cannot resist resuming (after a break of more than a year) with a comment on the political power that homosexual activists can exercise.

I believe this is one of the most important (but at present hardly visible) issues for the coming federal election. If people are going to support the Greens and the Australian Democrats - and the actions of homosexual activists - then they should know exactly what they are supporting. If they are consciously going to support the imposition of the rigid framework of homosexual morality, and the shutting-down of all dissent from that framework, thus demonstrating the fatal flaw in the democratic system pointed out by Plato two and half thousand years ago, then our liberal democracy only has itself to blame. (Apologies for the necessarily long sentence.)

Season Six of 'Dancing with the Stars' - my favourite television entertainment program* - has the best talent to date. Except for one participant. Farmer David. David Graham could not dance to save himself. Todd McKenney's fiery tongue could not even raise a pointless hiss at last night's woeful performance. McKenney scored Graham a '1' and looked like he was itching to give a minus number. But yet again, Farmer David survived the elimination round. Why? Why has Farmer David passed through five elimination rounds when the rest of the participants are streets ahead of him in dancing ability? The explanation is as plain as the nose on your face. David Graham is a homosexual. The word went out... The 'audience' vote carries him through each time.

It will be interesting to see how far this pleasant-natured but talentless homosexual goes (let there be no misapprehension: Farmer David is on 'Dancing with the Stars' because he is homosexual) - and the extent of the promotional mileage homosexual activists can milk from his heralded outing on the top-rating program.

I rather suspect that David Graham is blissfully ignorant of the ideological and political function he is serving.

*I am not uncritical about this program, but I will leave my criticism for a later comment.