The homo-fascist juggernaut is taking all before it

California's supreme court has ruled that a ban on gay marriage was unlawful , effectively leaving same-sex couples in America's most populous state free to tie the knot in a landmark ruling.

In an opinion that analysts say could have nationwide implications for the issue, the seven-member panel voted 4-3 in favor of plaintiffs who argued that restricting marriage to men and women was discriminatory.

"... limiting the designation of marriage to a union 'between a man and a woman' is unconstitutional and must be stricken from the statute," California Chief Justice Ron George said in the written opinion.

These are the opening paragraphs of a report on today's Nine News online. Melbourne's Age (Australia's equivalent of The New York Times) was not behind in reporting the staggering political victory for homosexual activists worldwide, a victory that makes a joke of the democratic process.

The Age is a powerful promoter of such major PC-class campaigns (as is The New York Times), colluding with a captive judiciary and self-appointed specialist academic groups and law clubs to bring about social and political change outside the democratic process. The Age hierarchy of managers and senior journalists are unabashed about their political activity. The Opinions Editor, Roslyn Guy, sees her position purely in terms of promoting and forwarding the political agenda of Australia's dominant political class, which class has its dominant sister class in all the world's liberal democracies. How else would you explain commissioning a hack like Tracee Hutchison to mindlessly regurgitate the hate-filled bigotry of their class?

California's Chief Justice has ably demonstrated that the term "liberal democracy" is fast becoming anachronistic. The arrogance of the declaration (that the ageless definition of marriage as a union between male and female "must be stricken from the statue") signals that an usurping anti-democratic class is now unassailably confident of its untouchable political power.

Who would have imagined fifty years ago that a Chief Justice of a supreme court would dare to speak such insane culturally suicidal words? Who would have dreamt that a political class would be in a position to overturn a democratic system that developed in faltering steps over the centuries, a system that has its origins in Christian belief and the civilization that arose out of Christian belief?

Make no mistake about it. This political victory for homosexuals - as I have previously warned - is not about equal rights. It's not about the justice of an overdue adjustment to the existing moral, social and political framework of Western society. Every person already has the right to enter into the marriage contract, as the written and unwritten law stands. Changing the definition of marriage is about the overthrow of that framework; it's about the replacement of the existing framework with one diametrically opposed to it. The implications of the overthrow are extensive. One example will serve to demonstrate this.

Homosexual commissars are already in primary and secondary schools monitoring and correcting the language of the classroom in an attempt to erase the language of traditional morality. Say you have a son of sixteen years, a terrible, insecure age for most of us, and he has uncertain ideas about sexuality. Do you think the counselling of the homosexual commissar will be the same as the counsellor with traditional moral ideas? Of course not.

The sexual morality of the homosexual is that there is no sexual morality. Sexual activity is a matter for the individual; there is no right or wrong. If the sixteen-year-old imagines he has same sex attractions, the counselling of the homosexual commissar would logically be, "no problem, go for it." It may mean the irretrievable entrance of your son into the hyperactive sterile futile world of homosexuality.

I could extend the implications of this example, no doubt to the outrage of homosexual activists whose only response could be to accuse me of "homophobia". The evidence is there for anyone who will take the blinkers from their eyes.

At this present time, the state government of Victoria is getting the usual democratically unaccountable law club to review the provisions of the Equal Opportunity Act 1995 which exempt religious schools and people of religious belief from caving into the blackmailing demands of homo-fascists. The public generally know nothing about this behind-the-scenes activity until its imposition is fait accompli. It's all part of the unstoppable undemocratic homosexual campaign which has as its ultimate aim the criminalization of Christian belief.

comments: gerardwilson01@optusnet.com.au