I have just returned from a five week holiday at Burleigh Heads on Queensland’s Gold Coast. It’s a terrific place for a holiday. It’s also a great place for writing inspiration. We had a unit on the headland overlooking the surf breaking against the rocks. Further along was the beach that stretches mile or so to Little Burleigh.
My routine was to rise early, listen to the news, and begin writing by 8 am. At 10 am my wife and I listened to the Dutch news on SBS. Then we went for a 45 minute walk along the beach after which I continued writing. Each time I looked up there was the scene of the rocks, the blue water, the blue sky, and sometimes the board riders on their waves. It reminded me of my visit to Dickens’s house at Broadstairs. He had a writing alcove on the stair case landing which overlooked the sea – The English Channel. Below are some photos of Burleigh in 2015 and 1957.
I have finished the first major revision of Tony Abbott and the Times of Revolution. I’ve added two more chapters to the first draft. Shortly I will begin my second intense revision using the two editing programs Grammarly and ProWritingAid, both of which I can recommend. It will take another six weeks to bring the manuscript to publishing stage. I will be looking for a publisher.
Australian politics is full of well known figures that resemble characters from Jane Austen novels, notes Paul Brunton, emeritus curator of the State Library of NSW.
Be they the “pompous, the stupid, the self-serving, the snobbish, the superficial and less often the sensible and altruistic”.
It is Austen’s ability to create characters recognisable in contemporary society – to “dissect human nature with the skill of a surgeon” – that marks her genius, says Brunton, and one reason among many to observe the 200th anniversary of the author’s death this Tuesday.
While the cause of Austen’s untimely death in Winchester, July 18, 1817, is disputed, a series of public events have been planned to celebrate the life and works of the novelist who wrote three classics of English literature before the age of 25. Read on…
A review of Jane Austen and the State of the Nation by Laura Boyle
Jane Austen is universally acknowledged as an excellent writer with a fine grasp of the human condition. Her ever increasing number of fans, her inclusion in nearly every list of worthy writers and English Literature syllabi, her marketability and timeless appeal have created what might be called an international mania. Many would attribute her success to her wit and way with words, others to the age old stories of love and romance that she tells. It seems, however, as if there was more, much more, just beneath the surface: undertones and even overt messages that Jane Austen’s readers would have seen, but which are, for the most part, lost to today’s readers. After all, as Jane herself (in the guise of omniscient narrator) explains in Northanger Abbey:
“Oh! It is only a novel!…It is only Cecilia, or Camilla, or Belinda”; or, in short, only some work in which the greatest powers of the mind are displayed, in which the most thorough knowledge of human nature, the happiest delineation of its varieties, the liveliest effusions of wit and humour, are conveyed to the world in the best–chosen language.”
I have, over the past few months, had the great privilege of first hearing and then reading the works of celebrated Austen scholar and international speaker, Dr. Sheryl Craig. The talk she addressed to our JASNA gathering in November, entitled “So Ended a Marriage”, looked at Mansfield Park in light of the divorce and custody laws current during Jane Austen’s day. Drawing from actual divorce transcripts, she carefully laid out a plausible defense for Austen’s use of the novel as political statement about the rights of women and their treatment as property. An abridged version of this talk can be found on Sarah Emsley’s Mansfield Park site, and the entirety has been printed in JASNA’s Persuasions #36. Read on…
I finished the first draft of Tony Abbott and the Times of Revolution two weeks ago. It is now out for a preliminary opinion on its shape and content by someone familiar with the period (1960s and 1970s). I will undertake an intensive revision of the text as soon as the manuscript (plus comments) is returned. It will be a couple of months, at least, before the book is in publishable form.
I had temporarily withdrawn The Witch Hunters from sale because a reader had suggested there may be legal difficulties with some aspects of the story (I’m intentionally vague). On reflection, and considering recent events, I have decided the view was groundless, driven by scruples.
All satires draw from events in society and focus on the behaviour of people, people often in responsible positions. But drawing on people and events is not necessarily to focus on particular people and events, unless the writer makes it explicit. The Witch Hunters targets social and political trends and attitudes.
If anyone thinks they are represented in my story, they have a guilty conscience, or their imagination is working overtime, or they have feelings of self-importance, or all three.
Tony Abbott and the Times of Revolution
The end is in sight. Another 4 weeks or so and I should finish the first draft. I am at 132,000 words – too long. I will have to trim and cut some the material on the 1960S. I am happy with the shape the book is taking. Shortly I will post a description on the book page.
Alas, I have not met the end of March deadline for finishing the first draft of Tony Abbott and the Times of Revolution. I have, however, made good progress these last two months. I am at 115,000 words, and will probably go to around 140,000. Another 4-6 weeks should see me finish the first draft.