Why has it taken so long for some people to see what a disgusting unconscionable type Gordon Ramsey is?

Tracy Grimshaw has been long on our television screens. On the whole, it is evident that most people would find her interviews fair and conducted with dignity and decency, whether one agrees or disagrees with the line taken or her political and social presuppositions. Deservedly, she is a well-liked, even loved, figure on Australian television.

Gordon Ramsey has given ample proof, in personal appearances and in his television programs, that he is the opposite. He is a shell of a man, gutted of all the manly qualities that makes a man a man. That empty shell has lapping at the bottom the stinking swill of nastiness, cowardice, and selfishness. And he could not care less.

Ramsey is emblematic of the degeneration of men and maleness of the last fifty years.

Sneeringly he has mocked the uproar he has caused in Australia saying, well, what are yous on about? We're in Australia not middle America - as if the the equivalent Australian types he mixes with are representative of all Australians.

Week after week the Australian media is full of reports of the cowardly violence of young males who think nothing of what they do to their victims. This is where Gordon Ramsey's mentality is at home.

Can anyone explain to me what appeal Ramsey has to his many (reported) female admirers? Or tell me whether they realise that their admiration keeps that shell of a man in business? Or of the inconsistency...?

What Tracy Grimshaw said in response

Comment: gerard@gerardcharleswilson.com